Request a review on the Discord.

Review process:

1. Selection, timeliness, and potential practical use of the topic (0–10 points)

• Aspects to consider:
  • Timeliness and current relevance of the subject (objective).
  • Practical (industrial) utility and application.
• Scoring:
  • 0-2: Unsatisfactory, does not cover the task.
  • 3-6: Acceptable, partially meets the nature of the task.
  • 7-10: Appropriate, current, and important from both theoretical and practical perspectives.

2. Professional elaboration, originality, and achieved results (0–50 points)

• Aspects to consider:
  • Content completeness in fulfilling the set tasks.
  • Correctness and feasibility of proposals and originality.
  • Insufficiently detailed parts, errors.
  • Sound logical structure.
• Scoring:
  • 0-5: Unacceptable; does not deal with essential areas, contains many unprofessional or erroneous statements, verbatim copying from other authors without citation.
  • 6-14: Unsatisfactory; conclusions are not based on the situational analysis, the reality of the proposals is not verified.
  • 15-29: Acceptable, but missing elements and/or superficial, one-sided.
  • 30-39: Acceptable; proposals are only partially supported, variants are not/barely examined.
  • 40-50: Largely or completely appropriate. Proposed solutions reflect supported, deep, prepared analysis and have serious conclusions.

3. Literature used, citations, and bibliography (0–10 points)

• Aspects to consider:
  • Use of domestic and foreign literature.
  • Regularity and accuracy of citations.
  • Preparation of the bibliography according to regulations.
• Scoring:
  • 0-2: Knowledge of literature is lacking, used literature is unsatisfactory, citations are incomplete or not distinguished from own work.
  • 3-6: Acceptable; knows only domestic literature, processing is mechanical, citations/bibliography contain data errors or are disorganized.
  • 7-10: Knows and is proficient in domestic and foreign literature; citations and bibliography are precise.

4. Applied solution methods and their numerical correctness (0–15 points)

• Aspects to consider:
  • Expediency of methods (mathematical, statistical, empirical, etc.) chosen for the analysis, and the professionalism of their application.
  • Factualness and groundedness of the situation presentation.
  • Thoroughness of exploration/analysis, completeness appropriate to the objective.
• Scoring:
  • 0-3: Unsatisfactory.
  • 4-11: Acceptable, but missing elements and/or general, one-sided, contains numerical errors.
  • 12-15: Applies research methods appropriate to the topic and is numerically accurate; statistical support of results is correct.

5. Editing and formal appearance (0–15 points)

• Aspects to consider:
  • Structural setup, articulation/segmentation.
  • Style, language, illustrations, appendices, spelling.
• Scoring:
  • 0-3: Verbose, digressing, illogical, confusing typos, misprints.
  • 4-11: Partially appropriate; difficult to overview, not uniform in appearance, minor errors occur.
  • 12-15: Well-structured, tastefully designed, presents figures and tables clearly, language and layout are completely impeccable.